🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its action.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries created after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

This decision is part of a countrywide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add a number of more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation aligned with his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic leaders lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic figure said the court had yet again damaged its credibility by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.